Repeated Fecal Occult Blood Test Positivity Is Associated with Clinically Significant Colonoscopic Findings

Authors

Halit Kandemir, Güner Kılıç, Ali Karataş, Beril Demir, Enes Cömert, Derya Kirman, Çağdaş Kalkan, Murat Kekilli, Tarkan Karakan, Mehmet Cindoruk
https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.1295

Objective: Guaiac-based fecal occult blood testing (gFOBT) is widely used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs. To evaluate the association between repeated gFOBT positivity and clinically significant colonoscopic and histopathological findings, particularly colorectal malignancy.

Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included patients with positive gFOBT results who presented to the Gastroenterology Outpatient Clinic of Gazi University Faculty of Medicine between June 2017 and October 2025. Patients were categorized into three groups based on gFOBT results: single positive (Group 1), two consecutive positive tests within one month (Group 2), and an initial positive followed by a negative test (Group 3). Colonoscopic and histopathological findings were compared between groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of clinically significant malignant pathology.

Results: Among 1,442 patients with positive gFOBT results, 735 (50.9%) underwent diagnostic colonoscopy. Colorectal malignancy was detected in 55 (7.5%) patients among those who underwent colonoscopy. Malignancy rates differed significantly between groups: 5.1% in Group 1, 17.4% in Group 2, and 0% in Group 3 (P<0.001). Repeated gFOBT positivity was independently associated with malignant colonoscopic findings (OR: 3.684; 95% CI: 2.027–6.694). Normal colonoscopy findings were significantly more frequent in patients with a single positive test, whereas malignant findings were markedly higher in patients with repeated positivity.

Conclusion: Repeated gFOBT positivity is strongly associated with clinically significant colonoscopic pathology, particularly colorectal malignancy. Patients with consecutive positive gFOBT results represent a high-risk subgroup and should be prioritized for prompt diagnostic colonoscopy within CRC screening programs.

Colorectal Cancer, Repeated Positivity, Screening, Fecal Occult Blood Test, Colonoscopy

1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834.

2. Shaukat A, Kahi CJ, Burke CA, Rabeneck L, Sauer BG, Rex DK. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Colorectal Cancer Screening 2021. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021;116(3):458-479. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001122.

3. Gupta S. Screening for Colorectal Cancer. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2022;36(3):393-414. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2022.02.001.

4. Young GP. Population-based screening for colorectal cancer: Australian research and implementation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24 Suppl 3:S33–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.06069.x.

5. Nieuwenburg SAV, Vuik FER, Kruip MJHA, Kuipers EJ, Spaander MCW. Effect of anticoagulants and NSAIDs on accuracy of faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) in colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut. 2019;68(5):866–872. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2018-316344.

6. Murphy CC, Sen A, Watson B, Gupta S, Mayo H, Singal AG. A Systematic Review of Repeat Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020;29(2):278-287. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0775.

7. Knudsen AB, Zauber AG, Rutter CM, et al. Estimation of Benefits, Burden, and Harms of Colorectal Cancer Screening Strategies: Modeling Study for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2016;315(23):2595-2609. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6828.

8. Tolunay T. Kara F, Keskinkılıç B. Publishing Coordinators. Turkey Cancer Control Programme. Ankara, 2021. Accessed: 2026 Jan 15. Available from: https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/kanser-db/Dokumanlar/Raporlar/Turkey_NCCP_18_April_2022.

9. Pignone M, Campbell MK, Carr C, Phillips C. Meta-analysis of dietary restriction during fecal occult blood testing. Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4(4):150-156.

10. Sawhney MS, McDougall H, Nelson DB, Bond JH. Fecal occult blood test in patients on low-dose aspirin, warfarin, clopidogrel, or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Dig Dis Sci. 2010;55(6):1637-1642. doi: 10.1007/s10620-010-1150-4.

11. Aytepe UE, Donmez E. Türkiye’de Kolorektal Kanser Tarama Davranışları, Etkileyen Faktörler ve Taramaya Katılmama Nedenleri: Sistematik Derleme [The Colorectal Cancer Screening Behaviors, Affecting Factors and Nonadherence in Turkey: A Systematic Review]. Halk Sağlığı Hemşireliği Dergisi. 2022;4(1):56-76. doi:10.54061/jphn.980767. [Article in Turkish]

12. Ferrat E, Le Breton J, Veerabudun K, Bercier S, Brixi Z, Khoshnood B, Paillaud E, Attali C, Bastuji-Garin S. Colorectal cancer screening: factors associated with colonoscopy after a positive faecal occult blood test. Br J Cancer. 2013;109(6):1437-44. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.476.

13. Utku ÖG, Ergül B, Oğuz D. Gaitada gizli kan testi pozitifliği nedeni ile kolonoskopi yapılan hastaların kolonoskopik ve patolojik sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi [Evaluation of colonoscopic and pathological outcomes of patients who have undergone colonoscopy with a positive fecal occult blood screening test]. Akademik Gastroenteroloji Dergisi. 2018;17(1):17-20. doi: 10.17941/agd.431639. [Article in Turkish]

14. Rex DK, Anderson JC, Butterly LF, et al. Quality Indicators for Colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2024;119(9):1754-1780. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002972.

15. Fernandes C, Estevinho M, Marques Cruz M, et al. Adenoma detection rate by colonoscopy in real-world population-based studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy. 2025;57(1):49-61. doi: 10.1055/a-2382-5795.

16. Yavuz A, Ebik B, Karabulut Ü, Akkuzu MZ, Budak Ece Ç, Dursun M. Kolonoskopide polip saptamada ne kadar başarılıyız? [How successful are we at detecting polyps during colonoscopy?] Endoscopy Gastrointestinal. 2024;29(3):61-65. [Article in Turkish]

17. Kearns B, Whyte S, Chilcott J, Patnick J. Guaiac faecal occult blood test performance at initial and repeat screens in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(9):1734-1741. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.469.

18. Geraghty J, Butler P, Seaman H, et al. Optimising faecal occult blood screening:retrospective analysis of NHS Bowel Cancer Screening data to improve the screening algorithm. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(11):2156-2162. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.480.

19. Guittet L, Bouvier V, Mariotte N, et al. Comparison of a guaiac and an immunochemical faecal occult blood test for the detection of colonic lesions according to lesion type and location. Br J Cancer. 2009;100(8):1230-1235. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604996.

20. Kupper BEC, Junior SA, Nakagawa WT, et al. Comparison between an immunochemical fecal occult blood test and a Guaiac based fecal occult blood test in detection of adenomas and colorectal cancer. Appl Cancer Res. 2018;38(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41241-018-0056-x.

21. Yücel M, Demirpolat MT, Yıldırak MK. Colorectal cancer screening; colonoscopy and biopsy results in people undergoing colonoscopy due to positive fecal occult blood test. Turk J Surg. 2024;40(1):59-64. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2024.6352.

22. Murphy CC, Sen A, Watson B, Gupta S, Mayo H, Singal AG. A Systematic Review of Repeat Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2020;29(2):278-287. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0775.

There are 22 references in total.
1.
Kandemir H, Kılıç G, Karataş A, et al. Repeated Fecal Occult Blood Test Positivity Is Associated with Clinically Significant Colonoscopic Findings. Eur Res J. Published online June 15, 2026:1-9. doi:10.18621/eurj.1295

Downloads

Article Information

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article. The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request.

  • File Downloads 9
  • Abstract Views 50
  • Altmetrics
  • Share
Download data is not yet available.